<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razzed &#187; Technical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razzed.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razzed.com</link>
	<description>Blunt Musings: Analytics, Search, Marketing, and Privacy. And other random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Public DNS snaps up more of your browsing habits</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/12/04/googles-public-dns-snaps-up-more-of-your-browsing-habits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/12/04/googles-public-dns-snaps-up-more-of-your-browsing-habits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently added a Public DNS service. For a good definition of DNS, check our new wiki. In short: DNS is how your computer figures out where a web server is located when you type in any web address by your computer, meaning: Web Browser Email client Or, any application which accesses the internet (which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/12/04/googles-public-dns-snaps-up-more-of-your-browsing-habits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tutorial on Top-Level-Domain Names, Cookies, and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever notice that when you sign into, oh, say, Gmail, you sign in at www.google.com? What&#8217;s up with that? The reasons are technical, but it should be noted that when more and more traffic goes through the same domain name, you should wonder why. Before I go off the nerd deep-end, if you don&#8217;t know [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Analytics Tracking Parameters: Whoops</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/08/28/yahoo-analytics-tracking-parameters-whoops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/08/28/yahoo-analytics-tracking-parameters-whoops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick post regarding Yahoo! Analytics tracking parameters. Our conversion tracking software recently added support for Yahoo! Analytics tracking parameters, which, according to Yahoo Analytics documentation are: ysmtac — tactic code (Category) ysmchn — channel code (Source) ysmcpn — campaign code (Campaign) ysmgrp — ad group code (Ad Group) ysmtrm — term code (Keyword) ysmcrn [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/08/28/yahoo-analytics-tracking-parameters-whoops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google sees 92% of &#8220;top&#8221; web traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to write after reading this article in the New York Times. In short, Google &#8220;sees&#8221; 92 percent of online traffic for the top 100 internet sites. Other big boys, Atlas (60%), Omniture, and Quantcast (54% &#8211; I assume combined) don&#8217;t even get close. And the &#8220;small&#8221; analytics company StatCounter, appears on a measly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatically determining PageRank, or, unsigned integers in PHP</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/04/07/php-signed-integer-php/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/04/07/php-signed-integer-php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market Ruler, LLC develops software for web marketers &#8211; and as such, I&#8217;m always on the lookout for new technologies to make life easier on the PPC and SEO crowd. I recently took the SEOMoz toolset for a spin, and in one of their tests, I saw that they automatically checked the Google PageRank of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/04/07/php-signed-integer-php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome problems with window focus (workaround)</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found a workaround for a window focus problem with Google&#8217;s Chrome browser. Summary: var w = window.open(url, &#8216;windowname&#8217;, &#8216;&#8230;&#8217;); w.focus(); Problem is that the &#8220;focus&#8221; call doesn&#8217;t work &#8230; the 2nd time you call this function. The workaround requires you to retain a pointer to the window as a global, and just close it before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DKIM TXT Records in DNS exceeding 255 characters</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. It&#8217;s 2009, and apparently DNS can only support reading configuration file lines which are not greater than 255 characters. I received the following error in my system log when I was setting up DKIM entries: Mar  5 15:23:44 web4 named[66731]: dns_rdata_fromtext: domain.dns:16: ran out of space Problem is, the entire domain is then borked. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading &#8230; This may take a few minutes. (Firefox)</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently updated to Firefox 3.0.6, and even prior to this I noticed a message box appeared every time a new window opened: I&#8217;m not a big fan of this whole waiting thing, especially in my favored web browser, but I switched to Safari for a bit to let it do its thing. Unfortunately, it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical rebuttal of Mark Zuckerberg&#8217;s rebuttal to Facebook TOS change</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/16/technical-rebuttal-of-mark-zuckerbergs-rebuttal-to-facebook-tos-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/16/technical-rebuttal-of-mark-zuckerbergs-rebuttal-to-facebook-tos-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg defended the recent change to Facebook&#8217;s TOS in a blog post recently. As much as I appreciate any response from Facebook regarding their lecherous move, his rebuttal has no merit whatsoever. As a co-founder of my own startup in the 90s (unfortunately, never anything close to the scale of the 500-lb gorilla that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/16/technical-rebuttal-of-mark-zuckerbergs-rebuttal-to-facebook-tos-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of Google outbound link tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/analysis-of-google-outbound-link-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/analysis-of-google-outbound-link-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noticed in the past two or so months, after Google upgraded their SERPs to enable users to rearrange and delete results (see thumbnail to right) that the outbound links Google was posting on SERPs were redirects through the google.com site (meaning, they were tracking clicks on outbound links.) Since I often search for something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/analysis-of-google-outbound-link-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
