<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razzed &#187; Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razzed.com/category/tech/bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razzed.com</link>
	<description>Blunt Musings: Analytics, Search, Marketing, and Privacy. And other random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe products are buggy. Bring on HTML 5!</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2010/10/28/adobe-products-are-buggy-bring-on-html-5-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2010/10/28/adobe-products-are-buggy-bring-on-html-5-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeroenwijering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to think that Steve Jobs is right, mostly about reliability, security and performance of Adobe products. Maybe I&#8217;m just following his lead, but for the money I&#8217;ve spent on their product, their QA sucks. Adobe Updates: Who wrote this garbage? I purchased Adobe CS3 a few years ago and it has this built-in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2010/10/28/adobe-products-are-buggy-bring-on-html-5-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google sees 92% of &#8220;top&#8221; web traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to write after reading this article in the New York Times. In short, Google &#8220;sees&#8221; 92 percent of online traffic for the top 100 internet sites. Other big boys, Atlas (60%), Omniture, and Quantcast (54% &#8211; I assume combined) don&#8217;t even get close. And the &#8220;small&#8221; analytics company StatCounter, appears on a measly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome problems with window focus (workaround)</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found a workaround for a window focus problem with Google&#8217;s Chrome browser. Summary: var w = window.open(url, &#8216;windowname&#8217;, &#8216;&#8230;&#8217;); w.focus(); Problem is that the &#8220;focus&#8221; call doesn&#8217;t work &#8230; the 2nd time you call this function. The workaround requires you to retain a pointer to the window as a global, and just close it before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/16/chrome-problems-window-focus-workaround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading &#8230; This may take a few minutes. (Firefox)</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently updated to Firefox 3.0.6, and even prior to this I noticed a message box appeared every time a new window opened: I&#8217;m not a big fan of this whole waiting thing, especially in my favored web browser, but I switched to Safari for a bit to let it do its thing. Unfortunately, it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/upgrading-this-may-take-a-few-minutes-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

