<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razzed &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razzed.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razzed.com</link>
	<description>Blunt Musings: Analytics, Search, Marketing, and Privacy. And other random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Witty retort to &#8220;I&#8217;ve got nothing to hide&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2010/07/21/witty-retort-to-ive-got-nothing-to-hide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2010/07/21/witty-retort-to-ive-got-nothing-to-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I enjoy the discussion of privacy, especially with regards to the internet, and have serious concerns about the number of large corporations which now track every single page view of internet users, this article by Daniel J. Solove regarding surveillance is really compelling. It focuses on the claim of surveillance advocates, &#8220;If you have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2010/07/21/witty-retort-to-ive-got-nothing-to-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brin&#8217;s Foreshadowing of Google Books Privacy Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/20/sergey-brin-foreshadowing-google-books-privacy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/20/sergey-brin-foreshadowing-google-books-privacy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah. The Google Books fiasco. I&#8217;ve seen it in the news, have been quietly monitoring the situation, but I just read Sergey Brin&#8217;s editorial in the New York Times. One bit of language at the end really caught my attention: Last, there have been objections to &#8230; the details of our privacy policy. These are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/20/sergey-brin-foreshadowing-google-books-privacy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tutorial on Top-Level-Domain Names, Cookies, and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever notice that when you sign into, oh, say, Gmail, you sign in at www.google.com? What&#8217;s up with that? The reasons are technical, but it should be noted that when more and more traffic goes through the same domain name, you should wonder why. Before I go off the nerd deep-end, if you don&#8217;t know [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/19/tutorial-top-level-domain-names-cookies-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FeedBurner redirects through google.com</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/18/feedburner-redirects-google-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/18/feedburner-redirects-google-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that it&#8217;s news, but I did some quick analysis of FeedBurner, since I figured out they were acquired by Google, like, two years ago. The links that Google sends visitors to go through Google.com now: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Razzed/~3/&#60;some-link-identifier&#62;/ Note: I do not use FeedBurner for my RSS feed&#8230; I prefer to keep my visitor information, uh, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/10/18/feedburner-redirects-google-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is anyone worried that Google keeps grabbing more traffic?</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/09/28/worried-google-grabbing-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/09/28/worried-google-grabbing-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google snapped up reCAPTCHA recently. I&#8217;m feeling worried. As well, I must have been in a news bubble there, but they also acquired FeedBurner, in, like, 2007. They just re-branded it recently, which is probably why I didn&#8217;t notice. Now, I don&#8217;t put on the tinfoil hat very often, but Google keeps snapping up large [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/09/28/worried-google-grabbing-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google sees 92% of &#8220;top&#8221; web traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to write after reading this article in the New York Times. In short, Google &#8220;sees&#8221; 92 percent of online traffic for the top 100 internet sites. Other big boys, Atlas (60%), Omniture, and Quantcast (54% &#8211; I assume combined) don&#8217;t even get close. And the &#8220;small&#8221; analytics company StatCounter, appears on a measly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monster should be burned at the stake for email practices</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used Monster three years ago, and they just don&#8217;t get it. As a quick comment on the service, it&#8217;s the &#8220;shotgun&#8221; effect of recruiting. You get about 50 resumés a day, and they&#8217;re all crap. You spend about $300 for a listing, and you then spend more time filtering the crap resumés from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being Safe with Craigslist Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/02/being-safe-with-craigslist-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/02/being-safe-with-craigslist-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We accumulate a lot of junk in life. And when I say we, I think I mean the &#8220;American People&#8221;, but what I really mean is: me. My mother has perfected the art of accumulating things: She still resides in the house-I-grew-up-in (a 6 bedroom, 5 bathroom home) wherein each and every room is populated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/02/being-safe-with-craigslist-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook reverts to old Terms of Service (TOS)</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/18/facebook-reverts-to-old-terms-of-service-tos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/18/facebook-reverts-to-old-terms-of-service-tos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Score one for the users. Facebook changed their terms of service back to the pre-February-4th version. Over the past few days, we have received a lot of feedback about the new terms we posted two weeks ago. Because of this response, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/18/facebook-reverts-to-old-terms-of-service-tos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook TOS “takes away” your ownership rights</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/facebook-ownership-content-and-legalese/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/facebook-ownership-content-and-legalese/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;ve become embroiled in the hulaballoo over Facebook&#8217;s Terms of Service changes on Sunday, there have been many discussions on Facebook (and off) concerning the concept of ownership. Ownership, in the legal sense, related to &#8220;rights&#8221; over content. (Or Intellectual Property, in this case.) Photos, Images, Drawings, Music, anything you type into a web [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/17/facebook-ownership-content-and-legalese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
