<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razzed &#187; Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razzed.com/category/business/marketing/email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razzed.com</link>
	<description>Blunt Musings: Analytics, Search, Marketing, and Privacy. And other random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google sees 92% of &#8220;top&#8221; web traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to write after reading this article in the New York Times. In short, Google &#8220;sees&#8221; 92 percent of online traffic for the top 100 internet sites. Other big boys, Atlas (60%), Omniture, and Quantcast (54% &#8211; I assume combined) don&#8217;t even get close. And the &#8220;small&#8221; analytics company StatCounter, appears on a measly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/06/08/google-sees-92-top-web-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DKIM TXT Records in DNS exceeding 255 characters</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. It&#8217;s 2009, and apparently DNS can only support reading configuration file lines which are not greater than 255 characters. I received the following error in my system log when I was setting up DKIM entries: Mar  5 15:23:44 web4 named[66731]: dns_rdata_fromtext: domain.dns:16: ran out of space Problem is, the entire domain is then borked. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/05/dkim-txt-records-in-dns-exceeding-255-characters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monster should be burned at the stake for email practices</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used Monster three years ago, and they just don&#8217;t get it. As a quick comment on the service, it&#8217;s the &#8220;shotgun&#8221; effect of recruiting. You get about 50 resumés a day, and they&#8217;re all crap. You spend about $300 for a listing, and you then spend more time filtering the crap resumés from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/03/03/monster-dot-com-email-practices-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ongoing list of bad email practice providers</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/ongoing-list-of-bad-email-practice-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/ongoing-list-of-bad-email-practice-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a short period in the late 90s and early 00s when I would use &#8220;disposable&#8221; email addresses for everything. I had &#8220;catch-all&#8221; email addresses such as anything@example.com which I would when signing up for a site where I was unsure of their email practices. If I signed up on &#8220;this-domain.com&#8221; my email would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/02/12/ongoing-list-of-bad-email-practice-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of the email link</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/the-death-of-the-email-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/the-death-of-the-email-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sky Is Falling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can contact me at &#8220;kent -at- no spam marketruler dot no spam com&#8221;, and remove the term &#8220;no spam&#8221; from that address. And I kid you not, you see this on a lot of sites, even ones which seem technical. I imagine a lot of people get blurry eyed at seeing that, and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/the-death-of-the-email-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
