<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAID 5 and MySQL is NOT recommended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/</link>
	<description>Blunt Musings: Analytics, Search, Marketing, and Privacy. And other random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 03:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=18#comment-358</guid>
		<description>hi,I should update MySQL to ProLiant DL 580 G7.Before read this article,I am ready to use RAID5.so, thanks a lot.
by the way, which version of MySQL you used? and how about the performence now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,I should update MySQL to ProLiant DL 580 G7.Before read this article,I am ready to use RAID5.so, thanks a lot.<br />
by the way, which version of MySQL you used? and how about the performence now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=18#comment-294</guid>
		<description>@Chris: Yes, we do millions upon millions of transactions per day. So, if you have a low-transaction environment (I would consider 10000 to be low on a per-day basis), then RAID 5 may be what you want.

With any advice - test it out on your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris: Yes, we do millions upon millions of transactions per day. So, if you have a low-transaction environment (I would consider 10000 to be low on a per-day basis), then RAID 5 may be what you want.</p>
<p>With any advice &#8211; test it out on your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=18#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Is the RAID 5 issue applicable to any MySQL environment or only one with a high transaction rate, in the order of tens of thousands of transactions a day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the RAID 5 issue applicable to any MySQL environment or only one with a high transaction rate, in the order of tens of thousands of transactions a day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanat</title>
		<link>http://www.razzed.com/2009/01/14/raid-5-and-mysql-is-not-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razzed.com/?p=18#comment-203</guid>
		<description>good to know this.
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to know this.<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

